Actually, they're not, but when you compare FIFA to the BCS, the BCS is run by saints.
I mean, really.
NCAA is inconsistent with its punishments, and when it actually punishes people, it does so for the most stupid things (students selling their own jerseys is a huge no-no, apparently). The BCS obviously favors the big-name conferences and big-name schools. People talk about strength of schedule, but Oregon's in the championship game, and their SoS is only marginally better (by maybe one team) than Boise State's. The ACC get an automatic bid and their best team these last couple of years is more inconsistent than the value of the Mexican peso. The Big East gets an automatic bid and I'm confident that team for team, the MWC and C-USA could run roughshod over that conference.
It's all about money. It's all about TV deals. Notre Dame is also a BCS-qualifying team and they've been at BEST mediocre these last few years.
It's all bout money!
But no matter how many schools and students get gipped by the NCAA or by the BCS...they're still pinnacles of ethics and integrity compared to FIFA.
FIFA is corrupt. FIFA is broken. FIFA is a Europhile organization more interested in filling the coffers of a select few people than it is about making World Cups enjoyable, or hell, making football in general enjoyable. It's been happening for awhile.
It's all bout money!
But no matter how many schools and students get gipped by the NCAA or by the BCS...they're still pinnacles of ethics and integrity compared to FIFA.
FIFA is corrupt. FIFA is broken. FIFA is a Europhile organization more interested in filling the coffers of a select few people than it is about making World Cups enjoyable, or hell, making football in general enjoyable. It's been happening for awhile.
2002 had the worst refereeing EVER (even worse than 2010), 2006 let the cheating and diving Italian team get past Australia (clearest instance) in a dive worthy of Olympic gold.
On the road to 2010, you had the French get into the World Cup with a handball that Ray Charles could've seen from his grave.
During 2010, oh man, so many instances- Coulibaly denying the U.S. a clear goal, the referees at the England-German and Mexico-Argentina playoffs (Mexico also got a goal stolen from them in the opener against the host country), Paraguay magically not getting booked in their 1st round game against Japan even though they confused football with kickball, etc.
And FIFA allowed it. Referees weren't suspended, and the only people that were barred from the stadiums were a group of very attractive Dutch cheerleaders because they were advertising Bavaria, a beer that directly competes with Budweiser, the official FIFA beer of the World Cup.
The only justice in the cup came when both Italy and France were granted early exits from the cup, thanks to Mexico and Slovakia.
And JUST when you have hope for the future, JUST when you think that maybe, just maybe, FIFA will repent and not do something mind-numbingly stupid...
Russia and Qatar are selected as the 2018 and 2022 World Cup hosts.
Again...what the hell?
You think that FIFA would have learned the lesson with South Africa when it comes to having host nations that a) are perennially underwhelming teams and b) don't have the facilities for it.
Let's talk about Russia first.
WHAT'S IN FRICKING RUSSIA?
Seriously. Why there?
Repressive government? Check.
Mafia ties? Check.
Tourism? Boring.
Russia, in its entirety, is pretty. It has nice forests and lakes, and...well, what else? Just like South Africa. There was NOTHING there. FIFA wants to give it to a country that never had it before and that's fine, but make sure that people will want to go. Even if I lived in Europe, I'd think twice about taking a train to Central Russia. Give to SPAIN/PORTUGAL! They were second in the bidding, have better stadiums and better cities to be at in the summer! Really.
BEACHES, PEOPLE!
BEACHES.
SUMMER TIME.
BEACHES.
Belgium/The Netherlands was also a likely contender, but it'd have been a possible repeat of Germany 2006. And England, wow, I really feel bad for them, they had the infrastructure, but not the team. I'd be willing to bet money that England will not even qualify for the 2018 World Cup, and after the way they played in the WC, I don't think they deserve to, either.
And they have proud teams, too. I hate the Portuguese crybabies as much as any honest, God-fearing man, but they field a good team. So does Spain, even though if you look closely, it's actually the Catalunya national team. Russia...not so much. The Soviet Union USED to be a good team, but the Russian Federation, let's see...since 1994, they've qualified for two cups, and exited in the group stage in both World Cups. Mexico may not be the best team in any given World Cup, but at least we've reached the knockout stage, and at least we've tried and gone down swinging.
Will the host country get out of the group stage in this World Cup?
South Africa was not so lucky (neither were the rest of the African teams).
Now let's talk 2022.
When I say Qatar, you think desert, you think oil, and you think Middle East.
"World Cup" is probably not something you think about, unless you're thinking of a sentence like the "Why the hell is Qatar hosting the World Cup?"
That's a question I asked myself, too, when one of my friends texted me saying that FIFA pulled the greatest troll ever and I realized what had happened.
First, let's talk location.
Qatar.
You're playing in the 100+ degree-weather in the middle of summer in the desert, in stadiums that haven't been built.
Really?
If anyone out there thinks oil money had nothing to do with it, let me know, because there's a bridge in New York I'd like to sell you. FIFA should have looked away from the piles of oil money and looked at things as they were: It won't be an accessible World Cup. WHO WANTS TO GO TO THE DESERT IN THE MIDDLE OF THE SUMMER? If it's winter, I'm not thinking, "Well, gee, I'm sure being in Siberia right now would be just peachy!"
SERIOUSLY YOU GUYS.
Last I checked, the region wasn't exactly very stable. Qatar is one of the more progressive countries in the Middle East, but that's not saying a lot. It's still ruled by a single monarch and its laws are theist laws.
FIFA is asking for trouble, and I'm not even talking about terrorism, because as far as that goes, Qatar hasn't exactly been a hotbed for terrorism. But still an area controlled by Islamic law suddenly flooded with fans from Latin America and from Europe won't be very stable for long. And let's just say that Europe hasn't exactly had friendly relationships with the Muslim world this last decade. If there's 'outfit rules' at stadiums, FIFA might well have on its hands a bloody riot.
Some could argue that holding the World Cup in Rio is also highly unstable but...it's Brazil. I think that the violence in the favelas will be placed on pause for that entire month and then resume afterwards.
But people would at least want to go to Brazil, I'm sure.
And as far as the Qatari team....IT HAS NEVER EVEN GONE TO A WORLD CUP. South Africa's not the greatest team and not the best team in Africa, but they've gone to World Cups before it was their turn at least, and even though they've never made it to the knockout stage, their performance has been decent.
Qatar is ranked 16th in its conference and 113th in the FIFA rankings. Let me tell you who else is on that list:
1. Australia
2. Japan
3. South Korea
4. Iran
5. Saudi Arabia
6. Bahrain
7. China
8. Jordan
9. Oman
10. Iraq
11. UAE
12. Kuwait
13. Uzbekistan
14. Best Korea
15. Syria
16. Qatar
Outside the top 3, do any of those countries scream 'football powerhouse' ? Nope.
You could argue the same thing about CONCACAF, but CONCACAF, in comparison, is much smaller, AND half its members are tiny little islands.
It's going to be a slaughter, but I know FIFA's going to find a way to get Qatar at least some goals.
Football-wise, I don't see it happening. No matter what conference you can name, if the team's in the top 8, they would slaughter the Qataris on the pitch.
The United States was a much better choice. They have the stadiums, they have the great summer weather, they have the sights, they had everything. Even if football is not big in the United States, those stadiums would have been FULL. 'Soccer' is a steadily growing sport, and by the time 2022 rolls around, a lot more kids would have decided that football wasn't the best choice when you can do a lot more as a soccer player WITHOUT the average career lifespan of 4-5 years (and post-career pain for about 50 years). At the rate the NHL is going, I foresee a near future where it becomes a niche sport and soccer replaces it and makes inroads into the ground held by basketball and football.
Another thing, who DOESN'T want to come to the United States?
Attendance won't be an issue, 'things to do' will not be an issue, TV viewing would not have been an issue, but no..FIFA dropped the ball (ha) essentially flicking a huge middle finger to the United States.
It sucks, it really does. I love soccer/football with a passion. It's a sport I grew up in, it's a sport I can actually play (recreationally), it's a sport I breathe, and I wanted that cup to be held in the United States because it would have been awesome to go see a game, ANY game, at Texas Stadium.
But sigh.
FIFA, I am disappoint.
There's two things I can honestly hope for:
1. That Israel qualifies for the 2022 World Cup and gets further in the tournament than Qatar does.
2. Blatter and Platini have nothing do with the selection, and the new chair realizes that the stadiums are not built on time and no matter how much the Sheiks have paid FIFA, Qatar can't host the cup and the United States has to be activated on short notice, which the U.S is perfectly able to do.
sigh.